Substantialist View

Sakkāyadiṭṭhisutta

Substantialist View

Sakkāyadiṭṭhisutta

EN
At Sāvatthī. “Mendicants, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does substantialist view arise?” “Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …” “When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, substantialist view arises.
PL
Sāvatthinidānaṁ. “Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjatī”ti? Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe… “rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati.
EN
When feeling … perception … choices … consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, substantialist view arises.
PL
Vedanāya sati … saññāya sati … saṅkhāresu sati … viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati.
EN
What do you think, mendicants? Is form permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” …
PL
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti? “Aniccaṁ, bhante”. “Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
EN
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would substantialist view arise?” “No, sir.” “Is feeling … perception …
PL
api nu taṁ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti? “No hetaṁ, bhante”. “Vedanā … saññā …
EN
choices … consciousness permanent or impermanent?” “Impermanent, sir.” …
PL
saṅkhārā … viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti? “Aniccaṁ, bhante”. “Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe…
EN
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would substantialist view arise?” “No, sir.” “Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is nothing further for this place.’”
PL
api nu taṁ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti? “No hetaṁ, bhante”. “Evaṁ passaṁ …pe… nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
PL
Chaṭṭhaṁ.

Pāli root text and English translation by Bhikkhu Sujato from SuttaCentral (https://suttacentral.net), CC0.

Source